Points of View
I wonder why so often the question comes up if a master is "allowed" to do so and so. That's not a thought I often have , I pretty much assume if someone tells me they have a master then that master is allowed free range as far as whatever is permissible, what is a good idea now that's a different question altogether. I may indeed come across something and internally question the wisdom of a particular action of a random master based on whatever limited information that I have but the right of them to execute it, they are the master of course they have the right.
It is becoming clearer to me that this isn't a common way of thinking even within the M/s community. So many people use the term M/s and mean a variety of different power exchange set ups by it that range from pre negotiated and written out short term limited control contracted on line only to live in 24/7 complete control situations. that leaves a lot of room for misunderstandings since common language isn't always so common. There's room for differing points of view but I think we need more words. :)
It is becoming clearer to me that this isn't a common way of thinking even within the M/s community. So many people use the term M/s and mean a variety of different power exchange set ups by it that range from pre negotiated and written out short term limited control contracted on line only to live in 24/7 complete control situations. that leaves a lot of room for misunderstandings since common language isn't always so common. There's room for differing points of view but I think we need more words. :)
Comments
Post a Comment